When you hear about a brand‑new decentralized exchange that promises zero trading fees, the first thought is usually excitement - who wouldn’t love to keep every satoshi from a trade? MonoSwap v3 (Blast) is that buzzword‑filled project: a fresh DEX built on the Blast blockchain and marketed as a yield‑driven launchpad for the Blast ecosystem. Launched in 2024, it’s still a toddler in the crowded DeFi playground. This review unpacks whether the zero‑fee promise outweighs the glaring lack of liquidity, trust scores, and real‑world usage.
At its core, MonoSwap v3 (Blast) is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that lives entirely on the Blast layer‑2 network. The platform’s UI mirrors familiar DEX layouts: connect your wallet, pick a pair, hit swap. The twist is the advertised 0% maker and taker fee structure, which the team claims makes the exchange “inherently cost‑effective.” Unlike giant DEXes that span multiple chains, MonoSwap is single‑chain, meaning every trade stays within Blast’s fast, low‑cost environment.
Exchange | Trust Score* | 24‑Hour Volume (USD) | Fees | Supported Chains | Liquidity Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MonoSwap v3 (Blast) | 2 / 0 (BeInCrypto / CoinGecko) | $10,746 (CoinMarketCap) - $6,088 (alternative source) | 0% maker / 0% taker | Blast only | 0th percentile |
Uniswap | 9+ (high trust) | ~ $1.2B | 0.30% taker | Ethereum, Optimism, Arbitrum, Polygon | Top 1% |
SushiSwap | 7+ (good trust) | ~ $350M | 0.25% taker | Multi‑chain (Ethereum, BSC, Polygon…) | Top 5% |
*Trust scores are taken from public aggregators; higher numbers mean more confidence from the community.
The headline that draws users in is the zero‑fee model. With no maker or taker fees, a trader theoretically saves a full 0.3% on each swap compared to Uniswap. In practice, the only cost you’ll see is the underlying Blast network gas fee, which is already cheap (often under $0.01 for standard swaps).
Liquidity is the lifeblood of any DEX. If you try to trade a larger amount on MonoSwap, you’ll likely encounter a slippage that dwarfs the 0.609% average bid‑ask spread reported in the limited data set. The exchange lists only 3-4 trading pairs - most active being USDB‑3/WETH‑14 - and the 24‑hour volume hovers around $10k. By comparison, Uniswap processes millions of dollars each hour.
Why does low liquidity matter?
For a casual user who trades under $50, the impact might be negligible. For anyone looking to move $5k or more, MonoSwap’s liquidity issues become a serious blocker.
Trust scores are a quick sanity check. CoinGecko rates MonoSwap at 0, while BeInCrypto gives it a 2 out of 10 and ranks it #803 in trustworthiness. Those numbers scream “proceed with caution.” The platform’s Twitter account boasts over 100k followers, which sounds impressive, yet the actual on‑chain activity tells a different story: zero transactions in the last 30days (as of September2025) and a negligible web traffic ranking (550/619 among exchanges).
In short, the social hype is not translating into real usage. A community that’s vocal but inactive can be a red flag - it suggests the project may be more about marketing than delivering a functional product.
If you’re still curious enough to give MonoSwap a test run, here’s what you’ll need:
Behind the scenes, the DEX routes your trade to the on‑chain order book. Because the order book is shallow, always double‑check the estimated slippage before confirming.
When you line up MonoSwap next to the market leaders, three themes pop up:
Bottom line: If you value cheap trades above everything else and you’re comfortable handling potentially high slippage, MonoSwap might be a niche tool. For most traders, the safety and depth of Uniswap or SushiSwap outweigh a few pennies in fees.
Every DeFi platform carries risk, but here are the ones that stand out for MonoSwap:
Given these concerns, many seasoned users treat MonoSwap as a “play‑with‑caution” platform - perhaps a place to test a few micro‑swaps, but not a primary trading hub.
The platform’s success hinges on three variables:
At the moment, there are no public roadmaps or strategic partnerships announced, so the future feels uncertain. Users who believe in the Blast vision might still keep an eye on MonoSwap, but a prudent approach is to diversify across proven DEXes while waiting for tangible improvements.
Yes. The platform advertises a 0% maker and taker fee. You’ll still pay the ordinary Blast network gas fee, which is usually a few cents.
Any Web3 wallet that can connect to the Blast network works - MetaMask (with a custom RPC), Trust Wallet, or dedicated Blast wallets like BlastPad.
Only three to four pairs are listed, with USDB‑3/WETH‑14 being the most active. The exact count varies between data providers, but it’s a tiny selection compared to multi‑chain DEXes.
Safety is mixed. The smart contracts are public, but the platform lacks third‑party audit reports and carries a trust score of 0‑2 out of 10. Use only small amounts you can afford to lose.
Liquidity. With a 0th percentile ranking and daily volume under $11k, even modest trades can suffer high slippage, making the zero‑fee claim less appealing.