This tool helps you understand how teleBTC compares to established wrapped Bitcoin tokens like WBTC, renBTC, and sBTC based on key metrics.
teleBTC fails several critical tests:
When you see teleBTC is a decentralized wrapped Bitcoin protocol that aims to bring Bitcoin liquidity to programmable blockchains, you might wonder whether it actually works like other wrapped assets.
According to the original research paper "TeleBTC: Trustless Wrapped Bitcoin" (arXiv:2307.13848), the project promises a fully decentralized architecture that locks Bitcoin as collateral and issues a wrapped version on another chain. The authors describe an over‑collateralized security model meant to protect holders even if part of the collateral is lost.
The contract address 0xC58C1117DA964aEbe91fEF88f6f5703e79bdA574
is registered on the Binance Smart Chain. Although the whitepaper emphasizes integration with Polygon for cross‑chain utility, live explorers show the token only on BSC, suggesting a single‑chain deployment despite the multi‑chain narrative.
Established wrapped tokens-WBTC, renBTC and sBTC-maintain a 1:1 price peg to the native Bitcoin market price, usually within a 0.5% band. In contrast, price feeds on major aggregators list teleBTC at about $120,000, roughly double Bitcoin’s $60,000 level on the same day (Oct92025). This premium violates the basic economics of a wrapped asset and raises immediate red flags.
LiveCoinWatch ranks teleBTC at #9,549 by market cap, yet shows a reported market cap of $0.00. The same platform lists a 24‑hour volume of just $26, whereas CoinGecko reports around $800,000 in the same period. The discrepancy hints at either a reporting error or an extremely thin order book that can’t sustain meaningful trades.
The arXiv paper explains the protocol uses a Merkle‑based proof system to verify Bitcoin lock‑ups on the source chain and mint tokens on the destination chain. However, concrete implementation details-validator sets, consensus tweaks, or oracle mechanisms-are missing from public repositories. The GitHub repo referenced in the paper stopped committing in August2023, and no audit reports from firms such as CertiK or OpenZeppelin are publicly available.
Regulatory guidance from the U.S. SEC (July2025) states that any token claiming Bitcoin backing must maintain transparent, 1:1 redeemability. teleBTC fails this test outright. Moreover, risk‑assessment engines rate it at 98/100 (extreme risk), and the Blockchain Transparency Institute classifies it as “Category5: Non‑Functional/High Risk.”
Metric | teleBTC | WBTC | renBTC | sBTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Underlying Chain | Binance Smart Chain (claims Polygon) | Ethereum | Ethereum | Ethereum |
Price Parity to BTC | ~200% (≈$120k vs $60k BTC) | ~100% (within 0.5%) | ~100% (within 0.5%) | ~100% (within 0.5%) |
24‑h Volume (Oct2025) | $26 - $800k (inconsistent) | $1.2B | $120M | $45M |
Market Rank | #9,549 | #12 | #78 | #135 |
Audit Status | None publicly disclosed | 7+ audits | 2 audits | 1 audit |
DeFi Integration | None known | Aave, Compound, Uniswap | Curve, Yearn | Synths, Balancer |
If you’re looking for a reliable way to use Bitcoin on DeFi platforms, the answer is a clear no. The token’s price distortion, lack of audits, and almost non‑existent liquidity make it a high‑risk gamble. Even the few users who tried swapping it on BSC‑based DEXes reported failed transactions and empty liquidity pools. For a safer experience, stick with WBTC, renBTC, or sBTC, which are backed by transparent custodians and have deep market penetration.
In short, teleBTC serves as a textbook example of how a token can look technically sophisticated on paper yet fail the basic economic tests that keep users safe.
teleBTC is marketed as a wrapped version of Bitcoin that can be used on programmable blockchains, but it does not maintain a 1:1 peg and therefore does not truly represent Bitcoin holdings.
No verifiable redemption mechanism has been published. The contract does not expose a public unwrap function that guarantees a 1:1 swap.
The inflated price likely stems from data‑feed errors or intentional price manipulation, as the token’s market cap and circulating supply are inconsistent across trackers.
Given the near‑zero liquidity, failed transaction reports, and absence of security audits, trading teleBTC is considered high risk and is not recommended for most users.
WBTC is a centrally‑backed, fully audited wrapped Bitcoin that maintains a strict 1:1 peg and is integrated with major DeFi protocols. teleBTC claims decentralization but fails the peg, audit, and integration tests.