CoinDCX vs WazirX: How Indian Crypto Exchange Regulations Impact You

CoinDCX vs WazirX: How Indian Crypto Exchange Regulations Impact You
Michael James 9 November 2024 5 Comments

CoinDCX vs WazirX Compliance Checker

CoinDCX

India's largest cryptocurrency exchange with strong compliance posture

Fully Compliant

WazirX

Popular Indian exchange with recent security challenges

Pending Audit
Key Compliance Metrics
Aspect CoinDCX WazirX
FIU-IND Registration Active since Jan 2023 Active since Feb 2023
Major Security Breach July 2025 – $45 million loss 2024 – $230 million loss
Regulatory Fine (2024-2025) ₹2.5 crore (audit delay) ₹5 crore (KYC gaps & breach handling)
Cybersecurity Audit Status Completed Sep 2025 (Pi42) Pending – scheduled Dec 2025 (Mudrex)
Travel Rule Implementation Full compliance via TravelRule-API Partial – manual checks for >$1k transfers
Asset Coverage 200+ tokens (DeFi & NFTs) 150+ tokens (top-50 focus)
User Base 4 million active users 3.2 million active users
Note: This tool shows key compliance metrics based on available information as of October 2025. Always verify current compliance status directly with the exchanges before trading.

Click on an option above to view detailed information about that compliance aspect.

Quick Takeaways

  • Both CoinDCX and WazirX must register with the FIU‑IND and follow the PMLA‑based KYC/AML regime introduced in March2023.
  • The September2025 FIU mandate now forces every VASP to undergo a CERT‑In‑approved cybersecurity audit.
  • WazirX suffered a $230million breach in 2024; CoinDCX faced a major breach in July2025. Both incidents triggered higher fines and stricter oversight.
  • India enforces the FATF Travel Rule with zero‑threshold reporting, meaning every crypto transfer must include full sender‑receiver details.
  • Compliance costs are pushing smaller Indian exchanges out of the market, while large players like CoinDCX can absorb the expense and even partner with local cybersecurity firms.

Regulatory Foundations in India

India’s crypto framework rests on two pillars: the Financial Intelligence Unit of India (FIU‑IND) and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In March2023, the government classified Virtual Digital Asset (VDA) service providers as “banking‑level” entities, compelling them to adopt rigorous KYC, AML, and reporting standards similar to traditional financial institutions.

Since then, the regulatory regime has layered additional obligations:

  1. Continuous registration with FIU‑IND.
  2. Real‑time reporting of suspicious transactions.
  3. Implementation of the FATF Travel Rule with no minimum transaction threshold.
  4. Mandatory cybersecurity audits by CERT‑In‑approved firms (effective September2025).

Why the Travel Rule Matters

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Travel Rule requires VASPs to transmit the full sender‑receiver data for every crypto movement. India has adopted a zero‑threshold version, meaning even a $10 transfer must carry name, address, and wallet identifiers. Failure to comply can trigger FIU fines ranging from ₹5lakh to ₹2crore per breach, plus possible suspension of the exchange’s licence.

For traders, this translates to a higher compliance burden: KYC documents must be verified for every user, and the platform must retain detailed logs for at least five years. The rule also forces exchanges to integrate with global travel‑rule compliance solutions like TravelRule‑compliant APIs, adding to operational costs.

Shoujo heroine confronting digital hackers, with glowing security icons and crypto symbols.

Cybersecurity Audits: The September2025 Shift

After the 2024 WazirX hack and the July2025 CoinDCX breach, FIU‑IND announced a new requirement: all VASPs must undergo a comprehensive security audit conducted by a CERT‑In‑approved firm every 12months. The audit covers:

  • Penetration testing of hot‑wallet infrastructure.
  • Code review of smart‑contract bridges.
  • Incident‑response plan validation.
  • Third‑party vendor risk assessment.

Non‑compliance results in a mandatory suspension until remedial actions are verified, plus a fine of up to ₹10crore. Smaller exchanges, lacking in‑house security teams, often outsource to firms such as Pi42 or Mudrex, which have built niche compliance products for Indian crypto firms.

CoinDCX vs WazirX: A Side‑by‑Side Compliance Snapshot

Compliance & Security Comparison (as of Oct2025)
Aspect CoinDCX WazirX
FIU‑IND registration Active since Jan2023 Active since Feb2023
Major security breach July2025 - $45million loss (hot‑wallet exposure) 2024 - $230million loss (cold‑wallet misconfiguration)
Regulatory fine (2024‑2025) ₹2.5crore (audit delay) ₹5crore (KYC gaps & breach handling)
Cybersecurity audit status Completed Sep2025 (Pi42) Pending - scheduled Dec2025 (Mudrex)
Travel Rule implementation Integrated via TravelRule‑API (full compliance) Partial - manual checks for >$1k transfers
Asset coverage 200+ tokens (incl. DeFi & NFTs) 150+ tokens (focus on top‑50)
User base (approx.) 4million active users 3.2million active users

Impact on Everyday Traders

If you trade on either platform, the regulatory churn changes three main things:

  1. Verification friction: Expect additional document uploads and periodic re‑verification, especially after the audit cycles.
  2. Fee structure shifts: Compliance costs are often passed on as higher withdrawal or transaction fees. CoinDCX, for instance, raised its withdrawal fee from 0.2% to 0.3% in August2025.
  3. Asset availability: Some smaller tokens may be delisted until a full compliance review is completed.

Many traders now diversify across both domestic compliant exchanges and offshore platforms that still offer lower fees but operate under a cloud of regulatory uncertainty.

Shoujo heroine and friends reviewing safe crypto exchanges on a glowing map of India.

Offshore Exchanges and the 45‑Day Notice

FIU‑IND issued a 45‑day compliance notice to 25 offshore VASPs, including Huione, CEX.IO, and BingX. The notice demands proof of Indian registration, AML policy alignment, and a recent cybersecurity audit. Failure to comply could lead to a blanket ban for Indian users.

International players like Coinbase and Binance have already registered, albeit with penalties (Binance paid a $2.2million fine). Their compliance pathways highlight two strategies for offshore firms:

  • Partner with a local Indian entity to share KYC and audit responsibilities.
  • Establish a dedicated Indian subsidiary that meets FIU‑IND registration criteria.

Until the deadline passes, Indian traders on these platforms may face sudden service interruptions, prompting a wave of migration toward compliant domestic exchanges.

Future Outlook: Balancing Innovation and Oversight

India’s approach mirrors global trends-tightening AML/CTF rules while pushing cybersecurity to the core of financial services. Analysts predict three possible scenarios over the next 12months:

  1. Consolidation: Smaller exchanges either merge with larger players or exit the market, leading to a more concentrated ecosystem dominated by CoinDCX, WazirX, and a few international entrants.
  2. Tech‑driven compliance solutions: Companies like Pi42, Mudrex, and Liminal Custody will see rapid growth as VASPs outsource audit, reporting, and custody functions.
  3. Regulatory refinement: The government may introduce “tiered” compliance thresholds based on transaction volume, easing pressure on low‑volume platforms while keeping high‑volume actors under strict scrutiny.

For traders, the safest bet remains to use platforms that have already cleared the September2025 audit and demonstrate ongoing FATF Travel Rule compliance. Keeping an eye on FIU‑IND circulars and audit reports will help you avoid unpleasant surprises.

Key Steps to Stay Compliant as a User

  1. Verify that your exchange displays a current FIU‑IND registration number.
  2. Check the latest audit certificate-most platforms post a PDF on their “Compliance” page.
  3. Complete full KYC, including address proof and source‑of‑funds declaration.
  4. Maintain separate wallets for large holdings; use hardware wallets for amounts over $10k.
  5. Stay updated on FIU‑IND notices via official Twitter or the government gazette.

Following these steps reduces the risk of account freezes, sudden fund losses, or legal complications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do CoinDCX and WazirX need to register with the FIU‑IND?

Yes. Both platforms have been required to register since March2023 under the PMLA‑based crypto regime. Registration is renewed annually and must be displayed on the exchange’s website.

What is the September2025 cybersecurity audit requirement?

All Indian VASPs must undergo a full security audit by a CERT‑In‑approved firm every 12months. The audit checks penetration testing, incident‑response plans, and vendor risk. Failure to complete it leads to fines up to ₹10crore and possible suspension.

How does the FATF Travel Rule affect my daily trades?

Every crypto transfer-no matter the amount-must include the sender’s and receiver’s full name, address, and wallet details. Exchanges must capture, store, and share this data with counterparties, adding an extra KYC step before you can send or receive funds.

Will offshore exchanges like Binance be banned in India?

They are not automatically banned, but they must comply with the 45‑day FIU notice-register, provide audit reports, and align AML policies. Non‑compliance could result in a ban for Indian users.

What are the biggest compliance costs for Indian exchanges?

Costs include annual audit fees (often $100k‑$250k), KYC infrastructure, travel‑rule API licensing, and staff training. Larger exchanges absorb these better; smaller firms may struggle or exit the market.

5 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    John Murphy

    October 10, 2025 AT 14:14
    I've been using CoinDCX for over a year now and honestly the only reason I stayed was because their audit report was public and easy to find. WazirX kept disappearing from my notifications after the breach. Not saying one's perfect, but at least CoinDCX doesn't make you dig for info.

    Still, I wish they'd show the actual audit PDFs instead of just saying 'completed'. Transparency isn't a buzzword, it's the baseline.
  • Image placeholder

    Zach Crandall

    October 11, 2025 AT 11:57
    The regulatory landscape in India is not merely a compliance exercise-it is a structural redefinition of financial sovereignty. One cannot underestimate the implications of the FIU-IND’s zero-threshold Travel Rule implementation, which, in its rigor, mirrors the precision of Swiss banking protocols. The fact that WazirX still relies on manual checks for transfers exceeding one thousand dollars is not merely an operational lapse-it is a systemic failure of governance architecture. One must ask: is this the future of decentralized finance, or merely its bureaucratic graveyard?
  • Image placeholder

    Akinyemi Akindele Winner

    October 12, 2025 AT 04:51
    Yo, WazirX got roasted for $230M and now they're still breathing? That's like a guy falling off a cliff and blaming the wind. CoinDCX lost $45M? Bro, that's a coffee run. At least they didn't leave their cold wallet keys under the mattress like some TikTok crypto bro. These audits? More like a rubber stamp with a fancy logo. I've seen better security at my local chai stall.
  • Image placeholder

    Patrick De Leon

    October 12, 2025 AT 06:05
    Let’s be real. India’s rules are the only ones that make sense. No other country forces exchanges to do real audits. The US? They let Binance pay a fine and call it a day. Europe? Still arguing over VAT on crypto. Here? You either comply or vanish. CoinDCX passed. WazirX? Still dragging their feet. If you’re trading on anything that hasn’t been audited by CERT-In, you’re just gambling with your life savings. And yes, I’m being serious.
  • Image placeholder

    MANGESH NEEL

    October 12, 2025 AT 10:37
    This whole thing is a circus. WazirX got fined ₹5 crore for KYC gaps? That’s peanuts. They had a $230 million breach and the government still lets them operate? Meanwhile CoinDCX gets praised for a $45 million loss? That’s still 45 million rupees in someone’s pocket they’ll never see again. And now you want me to trust these guys with my life’s savings because they did an audit? Please. The only thing these audits prove is that someone got paid to click ‘approve’. I’ve seen more integrity in a 15-year-old’s Bitcoin wallet. This isn’t regulation-it’s extortion dressed up in a suit. And if you’re still trading on either, you’re either naive or rich enough to burn cash.

Write a comment