Directive 05/CT-TTg: Vietnam's Crypto Framework Development and What It Means for Users
On September 9, 2025, Vietnam’s government dropped a bombshell on its cryptocurrency market: Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP, also known as Directive 05/CT-TTg. This isn’t just another policy tweak. It’s the country’s first-ever legal framework for cryptocurrency exchanges - and it’s one of the strictest in Southeast Asia. For the 21 million Vietnamese who trade crypto, this means everything is changing. Fast.
What Exactly Is Directive 05/CT-TTg?
Directive 05/CT-TTg is a five-year pilot program that turns cryptocurrency from a legal gray area into a regulated asset class in Vietnam. It’s not a ban. It’s not a free-for-all. It’s a controlled system where only a handful of companies will be allowed to operate - and only if they meet brutal financial and technical requirements.
The Ministry of Finance is now the only body that can issue licenses. No more unofficial platforms. No more anonymous trading. Every exchange must be registered, capitalized, and monitored. The rules kicked in immediately, but exchanges got a six-month grace period after the first license is issued to comply. That grace period could start anytime between October 2025 and January 2026 - no one knows exactly when the first license will be granted.
The $379 Million Barrier
The most shocking part? The minimum capital requirement: 10 trillion VND - roughly $379 million USD. That’s not a typo. It’s more than 27 times higher than Thailand’s requirement and nearly 30 times what Singapore demands for similar-sized firms.
Here’s how it breaks down:
- At least 65% of that capital - $246 million - must come from institutional investors, not individuals.
- Foreign ownership is capped at 49%. Vietnamese entities must control the majority.
- All transactions must happen in Vietnamese dong (VND). No USDT, no USD, no EUR. Just VND.
For context: A small exchange in Hanoi with $190,000 in capital and 5,000 users - the kind that’s been quietly serving the market for years - now has to raise $378.8 million overnight or shut down. That’s not a challenge. It’s a death sentence for 99% of existing platforms.
Why the Crazy Capital Requirement?
Why such a high bar? Because Vietnam saw what happened in 2022.
During the crypto winter, 15 unregulated Vietnamese exchanges collapsed. Over half a million people lost money. Some vanished overnight. Others froze withdrawals for months. The government lost control. The State Bank of Vietnam estimated that $10.2 billion in crypto transactions flowed through unregulated channels in 2025 alone - most of it outside any oversight.
The goal here isn’t to kill crypto. It’s to stop the chaos. Dr. Nguyen Minh Tuan of Vietnam National University says the capital requirement is “necessary to prevent the market instability we witnessed.” He’s right. But critics like blockchain expert James Wo argue it’s designed to create a state-backed oligopoly - letting only a few well-connected players survive.
Fiat-Backed Stablecoins Are Banned
Here’s another curveball: you can’t issue or trade stablecoins backed by USD, EUR, or any fiat currency. That’s a huge deal. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC made up 63.8% of all crypto transactions in Vietnam in 2025, according to Chainalysis.
Why ban them? The government fears capital flight. If people can trade USDT for VND, they can easily move money out of the country. That’s exactly what the State Bank of Vietnam has been trying to stop for years.
But here’s the problem: most global traders use stablecoins to avoid volatility. Without them, Vietnam’s market becomes less attractive to international investors. And without international volume, local exchanges can’t grow. It’s a catch-22.
Platforms now have to build new token systems - maybe backed by gold, real estate, or Vietnamese government bonds. But no one knows how that will work yet. The technology doesn’t exist at scale.
Technology Requirements: NDAChain and National Standards
It’s not just about money. Exchanges must use blockchain technology that meets Vietnam’s National Cryptography Standard (TCVN 13057:2025). That means they have to connect to NDAChain - a government-built blockchain launched in July 2025 - for all transaction logs.
Every trade, every withdrawal, every deposit must be recorded on this state-controlled ledger. The State Bank of Vietnam now has real-time access to all activity on licensed platforms. That’s surveillance with teeth.
Plus, KYC/AML rules are now legally binding. You can’t trade unless you’ve passed full identity verification - and your data must sync with Vietnam’s national anti-money laundering system. No more fake IDs. No more offshore wallets. No more anonymity.
Who Will Survive?
Industry analysts think only 3 to 5 exchanges will qualify for licenses in the first year. Why? Because raising $379 million isn’t something startups can do. It’s not even something most private equity firms can do quickly.
Who has that kind of cash? Likely state-backed financial groups, major Vietnamese conglomerates like Vingroup or Viettel, or foreign banks with deep local ties. Think of it like a banking license - but for crypto.
That means the market will shrink from 21 million users down to maybe 5 million in the first year. The rest? They’ll either move offshore - to Binance, Kraken, or Bybit - or stop trading altogether.
A CoinGeek survey found 79.6% of Vietnamese crypto users think the capital requirement is too high. And 41.2% said they’d leave the country’s market if domestic options become too restricted. That’s not just a risk - it’s a likely outcome.
What About Taxes?
On September 20, 2025, Deputy Finance Minister Tran Hoang An confirmed that tax rules for crypto will be finalized by November 15, 2025. Here’s what’s expected:
- 0.1% tax on trades under 100 million VND ($3,900)
- 0.3% tax on trades above that amount
That’s low compared to Europe or the U.S. - but it’s still a new cost. And since all trades must go through licensed exchanges, the government will know exactly how much you made - and when.
What’s Next for Vietnam?
This framework is part of a bigger plan. Vietnam wants its digital economy to grow from 9.5% of GDP in 2024 to 20% by 2030. Regulated crypto is supposed to contribute 1.2-1.8% of that.
They’re betting that by controlling the market, they can capture value - tax revenue, job creation, tech development - instead of losing it to offshore platforms.
But there’s a risk. If the market collapses and users flee, Vietnam loses its position as the second-most crypto-adopted country in the world (after Ukraine). If only a few giants survive, innovation dies. If the stablecoin ban stifles liquidity, traders leave.
By 2028, Vietnam could become Southeast Asia’s third-largest regulated crypto market - behind Singapore and Thailand. Or it could become a cautionary tale: a country that tried to control innovation and ended up pushing it underground.
What Should You Do?
If you’re a Vietnamese crypto user:
- Don’t panic. The transition takes time.
- Start moving your funds to licensed platforms - once they launch.
- Be ready to verify your identity fully. No shortcuts.
- Understand that your trading options will shrink. Stablecoins won’t be available locally.
If you run a small exchange:
- Start talking to investors - now.
- Prepare your tech stack for NDAChain integration.
- Consider selling your business to a larger player.
- If you can’t meet the capital requirement, shut down before the grace period ends.
If you’re an investor:
- This isn’t a speculative play. It’s a regulatory play.
- Look for companies with deep government ties and access to institutional capital.
- Don’t assume profits will come quickly. Compliance will cost millions.
Will This Work?
It’s too early to say. The framework is bold. It’s comprehensive. It’s also incredibly rigid.
On one hand, it ends the Wild West era. No more scams. No more vanished exchanges. Users will have legal recourse. The system will be transparent.
On the other hand, it kills competition. It pushes users offshore. It ignores global market realities. And it may drive innovation - and money - out of Vietnam entirely.
One thing is certain: Vietnam’s crypto market will never be the same. The old rules are gone. The new ones are written in stone. Now, everyone has to adapt - or get left behind.
Is cryptocurrency legal in Vietnam now?
Yes, but only through government-licensed exchanges. Trading crypto is legal if you use a platform that has received a license under Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP. All other platforms are now illegal. You can still hold crypto, but you can’t trade it unless you use an approved exchange.
Can I still use USDT or other stablecoins in Vietnam?
No. Under Directive 05/CT-TTg, all crypto assets must be backed by real underlying assets - not fiat currencies like USD or EUR. That means USDT, USDC, and other stablecoins tied to the dollar are banned on licensed exchanges. You can still hold them privately, but you can’t trade them for VND on any official platform.
Do I need to pay taxes on crypto in Vietnam?
Yes. Starting November 15, 2025, capital gains from crypto trades will be taxed. Transactions under 100 million VND ($3,900) are taxed at 0.1%. Trades above that are taxed at 0.3%. All taxes will be collected automatically by licensed exchanges, so you won’t need to file separately.
How many crypto exchanges will be allowed in Vietnam?
Only 3 to 5 exchanges are expected to qualify for licenses in the first year. The $379 million capital requirement is so high that most existing platforms can’t meet it. The Ministry of Finance will likely prioritize state-linked firms and large financial institutions with deep pockets.
Can foreigners own a crypto exchange in Vietnam?
Yes, but only up to 49%. Vietnamese entities must hold at least 51% ownership. This rule is designed to ensure local control over financial infrastructure. Foreign companies can invest, but they can’t run the business alone.
What happens to my money if my exchange shuts down?
If your exchange is unlicensed and shuts down, you likely won’t get your money back. The new law protects users only on licensed platforms. Once a platform is licensed, it must hold customer funds in segregated accounts and be audited regularly. If a licensed exchange fails, the Ministry of Finance may step in to help recover assets - but there’s no guarantee.
Is Vietnam’s crypto framework better than other countries’?
It’s stricter than most. Thailand and Singapore allow lower capital requirements and permit stablecoins. Vietnam’s approach is more like Indonesia’s - cash-only, state-controlled, and highly restrictive. It’s designed for security, not growth. It may prevent fraud, but it also stifles innovation. Whether it’s “better” depends on your goal: safety or access.
20 Comments
Write a comment
Rahul Sharma
January 6, 2026 AT 15:26Vietnam’s approach is remarkably disciplined. The capital requirement, while daunting, ensures that only entities with real financial muscle can operate. This prevents the kind of predatory behavior we’ve seen in unregulated markets. The ban on fiat-backed stablecoins is a bold move to protect monetary sovereignty. NDAChain integration is a smart step toward transparency. Users will lose convenience, but gain security. This is not anti-innovation-it’s pro-stability. The tax structure is reasonable. 0.1% to 0.3% is negligible compared to the risk of losing everything to a rogue exchange. This framework will endure. The short-term pain will lead to long-term trust. 🇻🇳✨
Gideon Kavali
January 8, 2026 AT 12:07This is a catastrophe. A complete, utter, and deliberate sabotage of financial freedom. The U.S. didn’t build its crypto ecosystem by locking it behind $379 million walls. Vietnam is turning its people into financial serfs. They’re not regulating-they’re nationalizing. And the stablecoin ban? That’s not about capital flight-it’s about control. They don’t want you to be rich. They want you to be obedient. This isn’t policy. It’s tyranny dressed in a suit. The State Bank of Vietnam isn’t protecting citizens-it’s imprisoning them in a digital gilded cage. And they wonder why everyone’s fleeing to Binance? 🇺🇸🔥
Krista Hoefle
January 10, 2026 AT 08:25so like… the gov just said ‘no usdt’? like… why? also $379m?? who even has that?? this feels like someone in a boardroom who’s never traded crypto trying to ‘fix’ it. also why is everyone still on their phones??
sathish kumar
January 11, 2026 AT 06:40As a citizen of India, I observe Vietnam’s regulatory evolution with profound respect. The government has chosen a path of sovereign integrity over speculative convenience. The capital requirement, though severe, prevents the exploitation of retail investors-a lesson learned from the 2022 collapses. The prohibition of fiat-backed stablecoins is not an obstacle but a safeguard against currency dilution. NDAChain ensures accountability, and the tax structure is both fair and enforceable. This is not repression; it is responsible governance. Vietnam may be the first in Southeast Asia to prioritize systemic resilience over market volume. History will remember this as wisdom, not restriction.
Mollie Williams
January 12, 2026 AT 05:01There’s something deeply human in how Vietnam is handling this. Not with fear, not with greed-but with a quiet, almost tragic determination to protect its people from themselves. The $379 million barrier isn’t about exclusion. It’s about insulation. It’s saying: ‘We won’t let you be crushed by the next wave of promises.’ The stablecoin ban? It’s not anti-technology. It’s anti-illusion. We’ve all been sold the myth that stablecoins are stable. They’re not. They’re promises written in invisible ink. Vietnam is forcing the market to confront reality: value must be anchored in something real-gold, bonds, land. Not promises from offshore entities with no accountability. This isn’t a crackdown. It’s a coming-of-age. And it hurts. But sometimes, growing up does.
Ritu Singh
January 12, 2026 AT 12:24you think this is about crypto? no no no… this is a cover for something bigger. the government is using crypto regulation to track every single digital transaction. they’re building a financial surveillance state. NDAChain isn’t for transparency-it’s for control. and the $379 million? that’s just to ensure only their friends get licenses. who do you think owns those conglomerates? the same people who control the banks who control the media who control the elections. this isn’t policy. it’s a power grab. and they’re using ‘investor protection’ as the mask. they’ve been waiting for this moment since 2020. mark my words: next they’ll ban private wallets. then they’ll require biometric verification for every crypto purchase. then… you’ll need state approval to hold any digital asset. this is the beginning. not the end.
greg greg
January 14, 2026 AT 06:19Let’s break this down. The capital requirement is 10 trillion VND, which is roughly $379 million USD. That’s not just high-it’s astronomically high compared to global standards. Thailand’s requirement is about $14 million, Singapore’s is around $13 million. Vietnam’s is over 27 times higher. Why? Because they’re not trying to regulate-they’re trying to eliminate competition. The 65% institutional capital rule means retail investors can’t even participate meaningfully in the licensing process. The foreign ownership cap at 49% ensures local elites maintain control. The VND-only trading rule isolates the market from global liquidity. The stablecoin ban removes the primary mechanism for price stability and cross-border transfers. The NDAChain integration means every transaction is logged in a state-controlled blockchain with real-time access. Add in mandatory KYC synced to the national AML system, and you’ve got a financial panopticon. The tax rates are low, but irrelevant-because the system is designed so that only five entities can operate. This isn’t a framework. It’s a monopoly factory. And the users? They’re collateral damage in a power play disguised as reform.
Denise Paiva
January 15, 2026 AT 08:06It’s funny how everyone acts like this is about protecting people. The real goal? To kill innovation and make crypto boring. Who benefits? The same banks that’ve been lobbying for decades to keep fintech out of their sandbox. The stablecoin ban? That’s not about capital flight-it’s about preserving the VND’s irrelevance. No one wants to trade VND. They want USDT. They want flexibility. But now they’re forced into a rigid, state-approved cage where the only winners are the ones with government connections. And don’t even get me started on NDAChain. A state blockchain? That’s not innovation. That’s digital feudalism. The government isn’t building a market. They’re building a museum. And they’re charging admission.
Sabbra Ziro
January 16, 2026 AT 20:59I understand the fear behind this. I really do. After 2022, so many families lost everything. But I also worry about what we’re losing in the name of safety. What happens when the only exchanges left are owned by conglomerates with ties to the military? What happens when the next generation of devs can’t start a platform because they don’t have $400 million? This isn’t regulation-it’s consolidation. And while the tax rates are fair, the real cost isn’t money-it’s freedom. I hope the government realizes that innovation doesn’t thrive in cages. Maybe there’s a middle path: tiered licensing? Lower caps for small platforms? A sandbox for stablecoin alternatives? Let’s not throw out the baby with the bathwater. We can protect people without killing possibility.
Emily Hipps
January 17, 2026 AT 10:27Hey everyone-this is actually kind of exciting. Yes, it’s tough. Yes, it’s restrictive. But look: Vietnam is taking crypto seriously. They’re not ignoring it. They’re not banning it. They’re building a system. That’s huge. Most countries are still arguing about whether crypto is legal. Vietnam’s already building the infrastructure. The capital requirement? It’s a barrier, but it’s also a filter. It means the ones who survive will be serious players. The stablecoin ban? It’s frustrating, but it forces creativity. Maybe Vietnam will pioneer the first gold-backed crypto tokens. Maybe NDAChain becomes the model for Asia. This isn’t the end-it’s the hard first step. If you’re a user, adapt. If you’re a dev, innovate. If you’re an investor, bet on the future, not the past. This is Vietnam’s moment to lead. Don’t write it off. Help shape it.
Jessie X
January 19, 2026 AT 06:49they banned usdt so now what… people just hold btc and hope it goes up? this feels like forcing everyone to use cash but in digital form. also who’s gonna pay 379 million? the state? that’s not regulation that’s nationalization
Kip Metcalf
January 19, 2026 AT 07:38Look, I get why they did it. 2022 was a mess. But this? This is like using a sledgehammer to kill a fly. You’re not stopping fraud-you’re just making it harder for normal people to play. I’ve got friends in Hanoi who made their first $5k trading on local platforms. Now they’re out. And the government? They’re not fixing the problem. They’re just making it invisible. If you want real change, go after the scammers. Not the whole market. This feels like a power move, not a policy move.
Frank Heili
January 19, 2026 AT 16:02Let’s be real: the $379 million requirement is a non-starter for 99% of the market. But here’s what no one’s talking about-this might actually force innovation in a good way. If you can’t use USDT, you need alternatives. That means decentralized stablecoins, asset-backed tokens, or even tokenized real estate. NDAChain isn’t just surveillance-it’s a public ledger that could eventually become the backbone for a national digital identity system. And the tax structure? It’s simple, transparent, and automated. That’s better than the U.S. system. This isn’t perfect, but it’s not a disaster either. It’s a controlled experiment. And if it works, Vietnam could become the Singapore of regulated crypto in Asia-without the offshore loopholes. The question isn’t whether it’s harsh. It’s whether it’s effective.
Jacob Clark
January 21, 2026 AT 09:36Oh my god. This is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever read. $379 million? Are they serious? Who even has that kind of money? And they think this is going to stop fraud? No. It’s just going to make it more exclusive. The only people who can afford to run an exchange now are the ones who already have political connections. That’s not regulation-that’s corruption with a compliance badge. And the stablecoin ban? That’s like banning water because someone once poisoned a well. You don’t solve a problem by removing the solution-you solve it by fixing the source. Vietnam’s government is playing God with people’s money, and they’re pretending it’s for their own good. It’s not. It’s control. And it’s going to backfire. Hard.
Jon Martín
January 22, 2026 AT 12:45This is a turning point. Not because it’s perfect-but because it’s brave. Most countries are still stuck in the ‘crypto is illegal or a free-for-all’ mindset. Vietnam is saying: ‘We see the danger. We see the potential. And we’re going to build something real.’ The capital requirement is brutal, yes. But think about it: if you’re going to handle millions of people’s savings, you need serious backing. The stablecoin ban? It’s a pain, but it’s also a chance to build something better-local, secure, transparent. NDAChain? That’s the future. Real-time oversight means no more hidden withdrawals. No more rug pulls. No more ‘oops, our server crashed.’ This isn’t the end of crypto in Vietnam. It’s the beginning of responsible crypto. And if you’re mad about it? Good. That means you care. Now get involved. Build the alternatives. Push for better rules. Don’t just complain. Create.
Danyelle Ostrye
January 24, 2026 AT 05:18They’re not trying to protect users. They’re trying to control them. The capital requirement? That’s not about safety-it’s about exclusion. The stablecoin ban? That’s not about currency stability-it’s about preventing people from moving wealth. And NDAChain? That’s not transparency-it’s surveillance. This isn’t a framework. It’s a prison. And the worst part? They’re calling it ‘progress.’ I’ve seen this movie before. In every country that tries to ‘control’ digital money, the result is the same: innovation flees, black markets grow, and the people who wanted to be protected end up worse off. Vietnam thinks it’s smart. It’s not. It’s scared.
Dennis Mbuthia
January 25, 2026 AT 23:26Wow. Just wow. Vietnam is acting like it’s 1985 and crypto is a cult. $379 million? Are you kidding me? That’s more than the GDP of some small countries. And you think that’s going to stop scams? No. It’s going to create a cartel. Only the state-approved players get to operate. Everyone else? They’re out. And the stablecoin ban? That’s just ridiculous. USDT is the oil of crypto. You can’t have a market without it. This isn’t regulation-it’s economic suicide. And the fact that they’re forcing everything into VND? That’s just asking for inflation. People aren’t stupid. They’ll go offshore. And when they do, the government will lose tax revenue, control, and credibility. This isn’t a plan. It’s a tantrum.
Becky Chenier
January 26, 2026 AT 01:22I appreciate the intention behind this. But the execution feels heavy-handed. The capital requirement is so extreme that it effectively eliminates competition. And while the stablecoin ban may be motivated by legitimate concerns about capital flight, it ignores the reality of global markets. Crypto is borderless. You can’t force a global asset into a national currency box and expect it to thrive. The NDAChain integration is technically impressive, but it raises serious questions about privacy and autonomy. I hope the government revisits these policies with more nuance. There’s a middle ground between chaos and control. They’re not finding it.
Staci Armezzani
January 27, 2026 AT 10:38If you’re a small exchange operator, don’t panic-yet. The six-month grace period after the first license is issued gives you time to strategize. Start talking to institutional investors now. Look into partnerships with Vingroup or Viettel. Consider selling your user base to a licensed platform-many will want your customers, even if they don’t want your tech. Build your NDAChain integration plan immediately. And if you can’t meet the capital requirement? Don’t fight it. Pivot. Become a compliance consultant. Build tools for licensed exchanges. There’s still value here. This isn’t the end of your business-it’s the beginning of a new chapter. Adapt. Don’t quit.
Tracey Grammer-Porter
January 27, 2026 AT 16:22I’ve been watching this unfold from the sidelines, and I’m struck by how much emotion it’s stirred. But beneath the anger and the fear, there’s something quiet and powerful here: Vietnam is choosing to protect its people, even if it costs them growth. The $379 million isn’t about greed-it’s about responsibility. The stablecoin ban isn’t about control-it’s about preventing another wave of financial trauma. I know it feels harsh. But I’ve talked to people who lost everything in 2022. They don’t want innovation. They want safety. Maybe this is the price of dignity. Maybe the market will shrink. But if it shrinks and survives? That’s better than growing and collapsing. I don’t love this policy. But I respect it.